https://www.facebook.com/laoliang/posts/pfbid0aB3GZpyX8NvWRrW7R7G5iPQtvVqXnDdhyQBsyGDgwmEjokiVSXEKr9tZ3X65vNWJl
I understand that none of the 9 questions filed by MPs on Sers, was debated in Parliament on 4 & 5 Jul, due to a lacking in time, and the late order no. of the questions, and that the Parliamentary petition submitted by the residents through NCMP Leong Mun Wai, was rejected for failing to meet the requirements of the standing orders of Parliament, although an adjournment motion by the constituency MP enabled a speech by the MP & a response by the Minister
Also, after so many media reports, arguably, giving the impression that most of the concerns of most of the affected residents, have been resolved – perhaps the $64,000 questions have not been answered – which are as follows:
It may also be good – for the SERS (Ang Mo Kio) – to know how much estimated profits or losses will there be for the HDB, assuming all the residents take-up the replacement flats?
What are the development plans for the acquired site, and what are the estimated projected profits or losses, in the future?
In answering the above 2 questions – there should be transparency as to what is the breakdown of the flats’ prices, into construction, land and other costs?
Perhaps the moral of the story for SERS, may be that without transparency – there may be a lacking in accountability, or arguably, maybe even no accountability at all?
How many of the about 83 Sers in history, were for flats that were older than 30 years?
Also, how many of these Sers required the residents to top-up nothing, or hardly anything?”
