Up-to-date protection continues its decline to only 49%?
Does the above mean that about 51% refused to boost?
3 Feb 2023: 0.28 : 0.01 (28 : 1) Ratio of the Up-to-Date Vaccination to the No Minimum Protection, in ICU (7-day average incidence rate x the respective population)
“Unvaccinated stressing healthcare system”?
Since 83% of the eligible population has Minimum Protection – even if the chance of being in ICU, is the same for both the Minimum Protection & No Minimum Protection – does it mean that the ratio should be around 83 : 17 (4.9 : 1)?
Most in ICU & Deaths Up-to-Date Vaccination?
49% of eligible population has up-to-date vaccination
(3 Feb 2023) 2,,763,600 (49% x 5640000 Population at risk) Up-to-Date Vaccination divided by 100,000 x 0.01 = 0.28
132,000 age 18 & above No Minimum Protection (Jan 10, 2022 – don’t seem to be able to find the latest data?) divided by 100,000 x 0.01 = 0.01
https://www.moh.gov.sg/covid-19/statistics/
7-Day Moving Average of Number of Active Cases in ICU, per 100k Population, by Vax Status
0.01 Up-to-Date Vaccination
0.01 Minimum Protection
0.01 No Minimum Protection
Deaths
0.01 Up-to-Date Vaccination
0.00 Minimum Protection
0.00 No Minimum Protection
In this connection, the Govt’s lawyers (AGC) was awarded $22,400 legal costs & disbursements from the poor unvaccinated litigants who were losing their jobs, in their Judicial Review, which affects more than 100,000 non-fully vaccinated S’poreans?
In summary, the Class Action (coordinated by TR Emeritus) was primarily in respect of the Covid-19 discriminatory measures allowing employers to terminate non-fully vaccinated employees, among other things.
In this connection, it may be interesting to note that only about 1,000 persons out of the population of 5.45 million, have been granted exemption from being vaccinated, on medical grounds.
The AGC had argued that the Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM) communication allowing employers to terminate non-fully vaccinated employees, was only an advisory and not a directive.
The judgement described the statistics presented by the litigants as “shaky”, even though the computations were derived from data published in the Ministry of Health’s (MOH) website.
The computations showed that the primary reason of ‘so as not to stress the healthcare system” for the Covid-19 discriminatory measures, was mathematically flawed, as the ratios (incidence rate x the no. in the population) for those in ICU and deaths (fully-vaccinated vs non-fully vaccinated) indicated to the contrary.
Public Interest
As the Class Action was a matter of ‘very significant impact’ affecting an estimated 132,000 non-fully vaccinated adults (which may be increasing by the day as many have not taken their required boosters to maintain their fully-vaccinated status) – the litigants submitted to the court that no costs should be awarded as this was a matter of great public interest since so many people were affected and also a matter of great constitutional importance.
Unfortunately, the court was not on the side of the litigants.”
https://www.tremeritus.net/…/cost-of-20400-awarded…/
If you like to, please write something and share with your frienfs
How To Donate:
Paynow 81207465
Han Hui.Hui
