I refer to the article “8 town councils to increase service & conservancy charges” (Channel NewsAsia, Feb 27).
It states that “Charges by Jurong Town Council were raised in 2010.”
Have operating surplus?
According to the 2012/2013 annual report of Jurong Town Council – the surplus for the financial year was $598,503 and the accumulated surplus was $2,404,235.
So, why is there a need to increase the service & conservancy charges (S & CC)?
Accumulated surplus transferred to sinking fund?
Also, according to its 2011/2012 annual report – the accumulated surplus of $4,930,421 was transferred to the sinking fund in accordance with section 34 of the town council act which stipulates that when a writ of election is issued – 80% of the accumulated surplus will be transferred to the sinking fund.
If the party that wins the elections in a town council is a different one, the transfer is 100%, instead of 80%.
If not for this transfer of the accumulated surplus to the sinking fund in 2011, would there be a need to raise S & CC now?
How much accumulated surpluses transferred for 8 town councils?
I have only cited the example for just one town council. What was the total accumulated surpluses transferred to the sinking funds for all the 8 town councils?
In this regard, for example – Ang Mo Kio’s surplus for the year ended 31 March 2013 was $1,793,752 – accumulated surplus was $6,280,934 and accumulated surplus transferred on 18 April, 2011 to the sinking fund was $12,826,802.
Is there really a need to raise S & CC now for these 8 town councils?
Leong Sze Hian