Given the SLF’s mission and objectives – why is there a continuing need to have huge surpluses and reserves?
I refer to the article “Why Temasek bond got strong retail response” (Sunday Times, Nov 4).
It states that “Singapore Labour Foundation (bond) 3.203% (maturing) Sept 25, 2023 ($70 million)”
The Singapore Labour Foundation (SLF) was formed on 12 December 1977 as a statutory board to promote the welfare of union members and their families, and to advance the development of trade unions in Singapore.[1] The SLF provides financial support for the various educational, social, cultural and recreational activities and programmes organised by the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and its affiliated unions and co-operatives. The foundation also extends help to lower-income union members, and provides club and resort facilities to meet the recreational and social needs of its members”.
Given the objectives and mission of the SLF – why is there a need to issue bonds?
For example, it had a 1.3% 8jun2017, SGD (SG6V27982549) ($60 million).
According to SLF’s Annual Report 2015 (the latest that I can find by googling) – SLF had a Surplus before income tax and contribution to Consolidated Fund of $219 million, and SLF Group had Total funds and reserves of $2.4 billion for the year ended 31 December 2015.
Given its objectives and mission, why is there a need to have such huge surpluses and reserves?
Arguably, from an ‘objectives and mission’ perspective – every dollar of surplus and reserves may be a dollar less – available to help union members and their families.
By the way, how much has SLF contributed to the Consolidated Fund since its founding in 1977?
Leong Sze Hian