Alternative news in 1 day? (part 84) – Every “needy” media story is followed up?

I refer to the article “Singapore Budget 2014: Every case of needy persons in media followed up on, says Chan Chun Sing” (Straits Times, Mar 14).

Every case of a down-and-out Singaporean that appears on social media or in the newspapers is followed up?

It states that “Every case of a down-and-out Singaporean that appears on social media or in the newspapers is followed up on by the Ministry of Social and Family Development, its minister Chan Chun Sing said on Thursday.”

I would like to testify that to the best of my knowledge, practically every case that we wrote were contacted and assisted by the relevant agencies, even though their identities were not revealed in our stories.

Examples of the outcomes? 

I would like to share to the best of my knowledge – the latest situation and outcomes of 2 cases as follows:-

Elsie (not her real name), age 48, received training and job assistance and is now working as a security guard. As her pay plus the room rental for 2 rooms of her HDB flat is barely enough to cover her family’s expenses and HDB mortgage payments (she has 2 children) – she is still in arrears on her HDB mortgage. However, she has been allowed to continue to stay in her flat – despite the HDB’s letter of compulsory acquisition to her in July 2013 when we wrote the story.

The Legal Aid Bureau has been extreme helpful in her divorce court order enforcement of the $300 maintenance monthly for 3 years from her ex-husband, a 50 year old permanent resident who abandoned her in 2007 – which is still in process. (“HDB’s response to homeless story“, Mar 6, 2014)

(Note: As some of the stories have multi-part articles – I have referenced the latest one which should have links to the earlier articles)

Rina (not her real name) is now living in a homeless shelter for women and children. She sold her HDB flat to pay for her disabled mother’s medical expenses and other debts. After she crossed the 30-month debarment period for flat sellers to apply for a new HDB flat, she was assisted to apply and has been alloted a 2-room BTO flat which is under construction. Her mother is in a nursing home. (“Daughter became homeless caring for disabled mother“, Sep 25, 2012)

Some other stories and related articles:

 

 

Those who genuinely want to help?

As to “Mr Chan also asked his fellow MPs “not to judge” when stories of any of these families in trouble are highlighted in the media.

“Very often, there are very complicated stories behind each and every case. Very often the social workers and the community have been quietly working behind the scenes helping these families in need without fanfare,” he said.

He was responding to Ms Denise Phua (Moulmein-Kallang GRC)’s comments that a common response of Singaporeans when they came across others in need, was to take a photo or video and send it to social or traditional media, instead of contacting parties who could help.

“Those who genuinely want to help…we’ll be most happy to work with them. But for those with other reasons, it’s always difficult,” he said.”

– I am rather puzzled as to what he means or is trying to say with his remarks – “Those who genuinely want to help…we’ll be most happy to work with them. But for those with other reasons, it’s always difficult”?

1 example of a cardboard collector who wasn’t really needy?

With regard to “Similarly in 2009, there was a public uproar after a video posted online by news service Agence France Presse featured an elderly woman in Singapore who made a living by scavenging for scrap cardboard and selling it.

But later checks by government officials found that she owned property, had savings and a family who wanted to help her – but she did not want to rely on them”

– Does “she owned property” mean that she is staying in her own HDB flat or a private property?

What is “had savings”? – A few thousand dollars or more than $4,000?

What exactly does “had a family who wanted to help her – but she did not want to rely on them” mean? From our experience in volunteering to do financial counselling for the last decade or so – we often come across cases whereby if a family member is asked by the authorities about their aged parent working for very low earnings – the answer may invariably be – we want to help, but my parent does not want our help? At the end of the day – the fact is there are so many elderly Singaporeans irking out a living by earning less than $10 a day collecting scrap cardboard or used drink cans.

To all these needy elderly Singaporeans – it may be quite meaningless to hear a reply in Parliament citing one example of a scrap cardboard collector who arguably – don’t really need to make “a living by scavenging for scrap cardboard and selling it”!

Leong Sze Hian

 

About the Author

Leong
Leong Sze Hian has served as the president of 4 professional bodies, honorary consul of 2 countries, an alumnus of Harvard University, authored 4 books, quoted over 1500 times in the media , has been a radio talkshow host, a newspaper daily columnist, Wharton Fellow, SEACeM Fellow, columnist for theonlinecitizen and Malaysiakini, executive producer of Ilo Ilo (40 international awards), Hotel Mumbai (associate producer), invited to speak more than 200 times in about 40 countries, CIFA advisory board member, founding advisor to the Financial Planning Associations of 2 countries. He has 3 Masters, 2 Bachelors degrees and 13 professional  qualifications.