More social spending + low tax rates = highest surpluses (does not compute?)
How is it possible that we have the highest budget surpluses per capita in the world, with a very low tax rate and huge increases in social spending?
How is it possible that we have the highest budget surpluses per capita in the world, with a very low tax rate and huge increases in social spending?
Saying and comparing “population density” and “living density” in one go at the same time is arguably, illogical?
The opening up of electricity to competition has highlighted the humongous profits in the past?
Have you ever wondered as to why despite the consistent rhetoric that we have been increasing spending by a lot and will spend even more, but you always end up paying a lot more also?
Is there a world of difference in the way that SMRT’s last 3 CEOs were selected?
Is the income of family members needed when applying for financial assistance?
Singapore’s currency manipulation derives primarily from its public pension system?
Not fair that public servants (teachers) don’t pay for parking like other public servants – is it fair for Ministers to earn at least 70 times more than a lower-income public servant?
The real questions about “football match’s lights went off at 9 pm”?
Should we spend more on financial assistance. relative to ad spending?