The discussions also sparked a debate on controversial topics, like the effectiveness of re-employment.
Mr Leong Sze Hian, former president of the Society of Financial Service Professionals, posed a series of questions on re-employment and asked why the Government did not just raise the retirement age to 65.
Would workers be able to make ends meet if they were, say, re-employed on a 50 per cent pay cut? What if companies converted workers from permanent to contract schemes early on, just to avoid re-employment?
‘Why are the employers being given so many escape clauses?’ he concluded.
Responding, NTUC’s assistant secretary-general, Ms Cham Hui Fong, pointed out that under the re-employment law, workers who suffer huge pay cuts can ask the Manpower Ministry to arbitrate.
Re-employment, she added, gives all parties a flexibility that raising the retirement age will not.
Ms Cham also argued that if the solution was to be sustainable, it had to be win-win for workers and businesses, or companies may leave the country or find other ways of getting rid of their workers.
‘Let’s start with re-employment and see how it works out,’ she said.